Neural Ergonomics – The Organics of Thought – Part 3 of 3

Creativity and the Acquisition of Knowledge

The great Albert Einstein once said,Guest Posting “Imagination is more important than knowledge”. Truer words have never been spoken, and he is definitely one that would know. Although skilled in the disciplines of physics and mathematics, it was not the knowledge of these subjects that led to his groundbreaking formulas. Rather, it was his self-developed skill in properly UTILIZING his imagination that empowered him to discover new knowledge, literally dreamed into reality from nothing, that began to unlock the hidden secrets of the universe. Only after his imagination brought his theories to light could he begin to interpret this new knowledge in the languages of science.

Imagination is regarded by many as mere fantasy, as if nothing imagined could ever be real. Fantasy is certainly a product of imagination, but, as Einstein has well proven, imagination is capable of producing a great deal more. The discovery and realization of knowledge always precedes any possibility of understanding or explaining knowledge. The Logic of scientific disciplines cannot attempt to explain a hypothesis until after the imagination conceives a hypothesis. Without imagination science is meaningless, in fact without imagination science could never exist.

When we close our eyes, and thereby draw a curtain over the world outside the mind, we dwell in a space that at once seems localized inside of our head and yet, when viewed from inside, has no discernible boundaries. An infinite inner universe where we have complete freedom to create whatever we wish. Absolutely nothing exists in this space except that which we ourselves manifest. In this regard we all exist as the supreme being of this inner universe where the only limits of creation are those we impose on ourselves.

Neural Ergonomics empowers practitioners to seek mastery over their inner space and to expand its limits and applications far beyond any borders to infinity.

A Complimentary Approach

This article began with an explanation of Ergonomics as having two distinct and complimentary methods of application. One method pertains to designing tools and environments that harmonize with our natural body mechanics. The other method pertains to training the body itself to interact within its environment in harmony with its own natural mechanics. Thus the ultimate aim of Ergonomics is to achieve a Utopian state of perfect harmony between the body and its environment.

Neural Ergonomics embraces the same overriding philosophy and also utilizes a similar complimentary approach. However, a change of context from the Ergonomic paradigm shifts emphasis to achieving harmony between the mind and its environment. In this new context the mind is defined as the pure energy our thought or being, and the environment now encompasses the brain, the body, and the world outside, together as one.

One approach of Neural Ergonomic method introduces environmental elements designed with the aim of stimulating the mind to induce favorable Neuroplastic response. The complimentary method depends on the practitioner learning to utilize the stimulus to maximum advantage and thereby amplify Neuroplastic response to its greatest effect and practical realization.

Down to Earth

As mentioned earlier the mind and body share many attributes of design because they were both created by the same designer. Notice there was no mention regarding the nature of the designer. This subject could spark endless debate about the nature of the mind, its relationship to the body, questions of religious dogma, and the very nature of life itself. Neither the rigors of science nor blind faith of religion has yet to resolve these issues. Neural Ergonomics does not profess sublime hidden knowledge or attempt to explore or explain the mysteries of life.

The fact that we humans are self-aware, coupled with the fact that our self-awareness of our own consciousness is all that we truly know, behooves us to understand the nature of this awareness. We may never discover the truth about the nature of our existence or the force that brings us into being. But even though we don’t know exactly what this force is, we do know something about its behaviors, and we can utilize this knowledge to significant advantage.

Neural Ergonomics studies these behaviors to better understand the nature of the interactions between the mind and its environment. The aim of Neural Ergonomics is to develop principals of design and methods of application to empower the mind in its journey of self-propelled discovery.

Neural Ergonomics is focused on producing practical results by working to stimulate, revive, and amplify the brain’s primordial ability to think for itself. Neural Ergonomic training is designed to work directly with the brain’s Neuroplasticity to greatly extend the brain’s capabilities which in turn expands the mind to ever higher levels of awareness. Practitioners of Neural Ergonomics reap tremendous benefits with respect to mental health and well-being, and quality of life in all aspects. Over time, regular practice can produce phenomenal results.

Neural Ergonomic methods empower the individual to reclaim and amplify their inherent organic potential of brilliant creativity blended with the decisive deductive reasoning of critical thinking. Neural Ergonomics embodies a philosophy in stark contrast to the prevailing culture fostered by an education system that merely presents us with information to assimilate, instead of fulfilling its more noble calling of teaching us how to think for ourselves.

Professional Experts Help You Choose Environmental Essay Topics in Australia

Professional experts with extensive subject knowledge help you choose suitable topics for your environmental essay. Their guidance will help you secure top grades in the course. They boast extensive subject knowledge. Each paper is custom written and 100% original.

Environment study,Guest Posting an interdisciplinary academic field, studies the link between humans and environment, and the level and nature of interaction between them. It includes the study of varied aspects, from physical structures, to bodies we live, industries we build, complex multitudes of animals to conditions in plant kingdom. It deals with current issues like ozone layer depletion, global warming, deforestation, etc. Climactic changes are affecting the entire civilization because of which environmental sciences has become extremely important in the present scenario. Degrees in environmental studies lead to rewarding careers in air and water quality management, soil science, and as environmental consultants who deal in the correlation of human intervention, pollution, industries and natural environment. Thus it is a huge challenge for students to prepare environmental essay on an intriguing topic. You can seek environmental essay help from professional experts who will provide you with innovative environmental essay topics.

Best argumentative environmental essay topics for students in Australia

There are many environmental issues that can serve as the basis for argumentative essay. In order to help you narrow down a suitable topic and title for your environmental essay, we have discussed some techniques that you can employ. We have also presented a list of the possible argumentative essays topics for environmental issues in this article.

One of the most effective ways to come up with a topic and title is to note down any ideas you have in mind. Some ideas may be useless, but some ideas will help you to think of better topics and titles to write about. You can use this brainstorming technique to come up with a range of ideas that will lead you to a suitable environmental essay topic and title. Some of the topics include:

What more should the government do to put an end to non-renewable energy sources?
Are people overly concerned about the environmental effects of nuclear power?
Should the government make public transportation free to control the polluting effect caused by individuals travelling in cars?
Is the nuclear waste generated by nuclear submarines and nuclear power stations disposed safely?
Should car owners pay more tax because of the environmental damage caused by pollution?
What measures is the United States taking to reduce carbon dioxide emission?
Should the future cars be hybrid vehicles to reduce environmental pollution and damage?
Should individuals be penalized for littering the ground?
Should factories and industries, found guilty of dumping toxic waste and materials, be shut down?
Should individual households take serious measures for recycling the rubbish that they produce?
Are humans responsible for global warming?
Are hybrid cars as environmental friendly as they are demonstrated to be?
Should individuals purchase cheap goods, considering the environmental damage caused while producing them?
Can the United States be help up as a good example for the rest of the world when it comes to reducing pollution?
What are the causes of land degradation and how can they be controlled?
How can environmental essay writing services help you with your essay in Australia?

The environmental essay writing services hire the most talented essay experts from renowned universities of Australia. They have extensive subject knowledge and prior work experience too. They help you pick up a suitable environmental essay topic after in-depth research and analysis. Each paper is custom written to meet your requirements. The experts also use plagiarism checker software to remove any plagiarism from the content. You can avail the plagiarism report on request.

Place your order now and avail exciting discounts and other attractive offers from the services. Hurry!

Adoption of Ergonomic Program Can Deflect Workforce Crisis

U.S. industry is headed toward a workforce crisis that will require critical changes in our national paradigm. So what can you do to win and keep your workforce? Find out how the value of respect and workplace ergonomics can play an important part in how you keep and train workers today.

U.S. industry is headed toward a workforce crisis that will require critical changes in our national paradigm. Our workforce is not only declining in numbers,Guest Posting it is becoming increasingly multicultural. Even more challenging is the fact that workers now entering the workforce expect greater challenge and greater rewards from their jobs than their predecessors. In the keynote speech at last summer’s Material Handling and Logistics Summit, Benoit Montreuil, president of the College Industry Council on Material Handling Education, warned that long-term solutions to the pending workforce crisis will require American industry to adjust its attitude toward its workforce and develop new programs to protect the health and safety of that workforce.

Montreuil believes the crisis facing labor-intensive U.S. industries is threefold:

1. America’s workforce is shrinking. As Baby Boomers retire, there will be fewer workers to replace them. Industry must move to protect the health and safety of a smaller workforce.

2. The next generation of technology-savvy American workers is gravitating toward more challenging white collar jobs. Most labor jobs are perceived to be dull, entry-level jobs requiring little skill. Industry must focus on improved automation and technology that will provide more challenging, more varied and safer work environments.

3. Labor jobs have traditionally existed on the bottom-rung of the pay scale. New workers expect good pay and comprehensive benefits. In the past, many businesses have skirted this issue by either outsourcing labor jobs to foreign countries or hiring migrant workers. However, rising transportation and fuel costs coupled with increasing overseas pay scales have caused U.S. companies to re-evaluate the advantages of returning production to the U.S. In addition, the current economic downturn has sent immigrants packing with declining immigration rates expected to continue until the recession ends.

The implementation of ergonomic practices and installation of ergonomic equipment could become a powerful tool in industry’s fight to attract and maintain a viable workforce. A proactive attitude toward ergonomics demonstrates value and respect for workers, Peter Budnick, Ph.D., told attendees of a recent material handling conference. The founder, president and CEO of Core 3, Ergoweb and Ergobuyer said, “A well formulated ergonomics strategy supports and accelerates continuous improvement in any organization, facility or supply chain.”

Integration of ergonomic practices and equipment into manufacturing and business operations improves productivity, quality control, waste reduction and safety. Ergonomics can “operationalize” a company’s respect for its workers, said Budnick. He postulated that many companies fail to recognize the value of ergonomics because they misunderstand the concept and its potential application to their industry. Budnick said ergonomics is “essential in an effective continuous improvement system” in any business or industry.

Ergonomics takes a human-centered approach to task and tool design. It recognizes differences in the individual characteristics and capabilities of workers and strives to accommodate those variables into the design of equipment and the structuring of tasks. In effect, ergonomics works to fit the task or equipment to the worker instead of unenlightened approach of forcing the worker to try to adapt to the task. The goal of ergonomics is to prevent soft tissue, repetitive motion, repetitive stress and musculoskeletal injuries. Nearly half of all lost work days can be attributed to musculoskeletal injuries. These injuries cost U.S. industry more than $61 billion per year in lost productivity and an additional $20 billion in annual medical, insurance and workers compensation costs.

The value of respecting workers has been proven time and again. Toyota is one of several international corporations that has made ergonomics a pillar of its business execution plan. When workers are valued, productivity, product quality and customer service ratings increase dramatically while injuries, absenteeism and workplace negativity decrease significantly. Implementation of an ergonomics program demonstrates respect for workers and indicates that their health and safety is a primary corporate concern.

In formulating an ergonomics program, tasks, equipment and the work environment should be evaluated for the following factors:

1. amount and angle of force applied during task performance

2. velocity of movement required to perform task

3. awkward or fatiguing postures required during task performance

4. repetition or frequency of task

5. duration of task and number of times per day it must be performed

6. vibration worker is subjected to during task performance

7. contact pressure that must be maintained during task performance

8. environmental factors present in work environment, including lighting, temperature, noise, etc.

The goal of ergonomics is to eliminate the discomfort and stress these factors cause workers. Studies prove that implementation of an ergonomic program results in significant decreases in injury rates and associated costs, decreases in lost man-hours and absenteeism and a marked improvement in worker job satisfaction. With a general one-year turnaround on investment recovery, the implementation of a comprehensive ergonomics program could be the most cost-effective answer to American industry’s looming workforce crisis.

REVIEW: The Britannica Guide to Climate Change

Climate change and its cause,Guest Posting global warming, are concepts that are far less controversial today than they were a mere five years ago. Yet, both still generate heated debates online and off the Net and not only among ignorant laymen: scientists and politicians butt heads and shower insults on their opponents when it come to this most contentious of latter day apocalypses. I have written extensively and have read widely on these topics, but have yet to find a more balanced and roundedly-informed tome than The Britannica Guide to Climate Change. In 440 friendly pages, densely packed with state-of-the-art data and research, the Britannica team have covered every conceivable aspect of this all-pervasive phenomenon, bringing to the fore the most current knowledge; the most recent studies; the most erudite interlocutors; and the hardest of facts. The Guide starts with an edifying vade mecum: an introduction by the eminent scientist, Robert M. May. While clearly on the side of environmentalists, he is no starry-eyed tree hugger but a hard-nosed scientist, worried sick about our abuse of our only planet, Earth. This is followed by concise but comprehensive chapters dedicated to climate, climate change, and weather forecasting; the changing planet (land, hydrosphere, atmosphere, and the decline in biodiversity); and an overview of ideas and arguments about the environment, replete with a synoptic sweep of history and prominent thinkers. Finally, the book charts our (relative) progress and what more needs to be done, including an overview of all available alternative energy technologies. The book is refreshing in its objectivity and candor. It refrains from taking sides or from preaching. This does not mean that it is a soulless inventory of data: on the contrary, it is yet another passionate plea to save our planet and our future. But it addresses our brains rather than our hearts and this makes for a welcome departure from contemporary practices. I found myself compelled to lavish praise on this great book despite the fact that I wholly disagree with its spirit and thrust. CLIMATE CHANGE AND GLOBAL WARMING

“It wasn’t just predictable curmudgeons like Dr. Johnson who thought the Scottish hills ugly; if anybody had something to say about mountains at all, it was sure to be an insult. (The Alps: “monstrous excrescences of nature,” in the words of one wholly typical 18th-century observer.)”

Stephen Budiansky, “Nature? A bit overdone”, U.S. News & World Report, December 2, 1996

The concept of “nature” is a romantic invention. It was spun by the likes of Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the 18th century as a confabulated utopian contrast to the dystopia of urbanization and Darwinian, ruthless materialism. The traces of this dewy-eyed conception of the “savage”, his alleged harmony and resonance with nature, and his unmolested, unadulterated surroundings can be found in the more malignant forms of fundamentalist environmentalism and in pop-culture (the most recent example of which is the propaganda-laden cinematic extravaganza, “Avatar”).

At the other extreme are religious literalists who regard Man as the crown of creation with complete dominion over nature and the right to exploit its resources unreservedly. Similar, veiled, sentiments can be found among scientists. The Anthropic Principle, for instance, promoted by many outstanding physicists, claims that the nature of the Universe is preordained to accommodate sentient beings – namely, us humans.

Industrialists, politicians and economists have only recently begun paying lip service to sustainable development and to the environmental costs of their policies. Thus, in a way, they bridge the abyss – at least verbally – between these two diametrically opposed forms of fundamentalism. Similarly, the denizens of the West continue to indulge in rampant consumption, but now it is suffused with environmental guilt rather than driven by unadulterated hedonism.

Still, essential dissimilarities between the schools notwithstanding, the dualism of Man vs. Nature is universally acknowledged.

Modern physics – notably the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics – has abandoned the classic split between (typically human) observer and (usually inanimate) observed. Environmentalists, in contrast, have embraced this discarded worldview wholeheartedly. To them, Man is the active agent operating upon a distinct reactive or passive substrate – i.e., Nature. But, though intuitively compelling, it is a false dichotomy.

Man is, by definition, a part of Nature. His tools are natural. He interacts with the other elements of Nature and modifies it – but so do all other species. Arguably, bacteria and insects exert on Nature far more influence with farther reaching consequences than Man has ever done.

Still, the “Law of the Minimum” – that there is a limit to human population growth and that this barrier is related to the biotic and abiotic variables of the environment – is undisputed. Whatever debate there is veers between two strands of this Malthusian Weltanschauung: the utilitarian (a.k.a. anthropocentric, shallow, or technocentric) and the ethical (alternatively termed biocentric, deep, or ecocentric).

First, the Utilitarians.

Economists, for instance, tend to discuss the costs and benefits of environmental policies. Activists, on the other hand, demand that Mankind consider the “rights” of other beings and of nature as a whole in determining a least harmful course of action.

Utilitarians regard nature as a set of exhaustible and scarce resources and deal with their optimal allocation from a human point of view. Yet, they usually fail to incorporate intangibles such as the beauty of a sunset or the liberating sensation of open spaces.

“Green” accounting – adjusting the national accounts to reflect environmental data – is still in its unpromising infancy. It is complicated by the fact that ecosystems do not respect man-made borders and by the stubborn refusal of many ecological variables to succumb to numbers. To complicate things further, different nations weigh environmental problems disparately.

Despite recent attempts, such as the Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) produced by the World Economic Forum (WEF), no one knows how to define and quantify elusive concepts such as “sustainable development”. Even the costs of replacing or repairing depleted resources and natural assets are difficult to determine.

Efforts to capture “quality of life” considerations in the straitjacket of the formalism of distributive justice – known as human-welfare ecology or emancipatory environmentalism – backfired. These led to derisory attempts to reverse the inexorable processes of urbanization and industrialization by introducing localized, small-scale production.

Social ecologists proffer the same prescriptions but with an anarchistic twist. The hierarchical view of nature – with Man at the pinnacle – is a reflection of social relations, they suggest. Dismantle the latter – and you get rid of the former.

The Ethicists appear to be as confounded and ludicrous as their “feet on the ground” opponents.

Biocentrists view nature as possessed of an intrinsic value, regardless of its actual or potential utility. They fail to specify, however, how this, even if true, gives rise to rights and commensurate obligations. Nor was their case aided by their association with the apocalyptic or survivalist school of environmentalism which has developed proto-fascist tendencies and is gradually being scientifically debunked.

The proponents of deep ecology radicalize the ideas of social ecology ad absurdum and postulate a transcendentalist spiritual connection with the inanimate (whatever that may be). In consequence, they refuse to intervene to counter or contain natural processes, including diseases and famine.

The politicization of environmental concerns runs the gamut from political activism to eco-terrorism. The environmental movement – whether in academe, in the media, in non-governmental organizations, or in legislature – is now comprised of a web of bureaucratic interest groups.

Like all bureaucracies, environmental organizations are out to perpetuate themselves, fight heresy and accumulate political clout and the money and perks that come with it. They are no longer a disinterested and objective party. They have a stake in apocalypse. That makes them automatically suspect.

Bjorn Lomborg, author of “The Skeptical Environmentalist”, was at the receiving end of such self-serving sanctimony. A statistician, he demonstrated that the doom and gloom tendered by environmental campaigners, scholars and militants are, at best, dubious and, at worst, the outcomes of deliberate manipulation.

The situation is actually improving on many fronts, showed Lomborg: known reserves of fossil fuels and most metals are rising, agricultural production per head is surging, the number of the famished is declining, biodiversity loss is slowing as do pollution and tropical deforestation. In the long run, even in pockets of environmental degradation, in the poor and developing countries, rising incomes and the attendant drop in birth rates will likely ameliorate the situation in the long run.

Yet, both camps, the optimists and the pessimists, rely on partial, irrelevant, or, worse, manipulated data. The multiple authors of “People and Ecosystems”, published by the World Resources Institute, the World Bank and the United Nations conclude: “Our knowledge of ecosystems has increased dramatically, but it simply has not kept pace with our ability to alter them.”

Quoted by The Economist, Daniel Esty of Yale, the leader of an environmental project sponsored by World Economic Forum, exclaimed:

“Why hasn’t anyone done careful environmental measurement before? Businessmen always say, ‘what matters gets measured’. Social scientists started quantitative measurement 30 years ago, and even political science turned to hard numbers 15 years ago. Yet look at environmental policy, and the data are lousy.”

Nor is this dearth of reliable and unequivocal information likely to end soon. Even the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, supported by numerous development agencies and environmental groups, is seriously under-financed. The conspiracy-minded attribute this curious void to the self-serving designs of the apocalyptic school of environmentalism. Ignorance and fear, they point out, are among the fanatic’s most useful allies. They also make for good copy.

A Comment on Energy Security